Departmental autonomy, inside one identity
Give each faculty its own templates, imagery and messaging while institutional identity, central fields and legal details stay fixed.
Shared rules, ready before the brand team
LOCAL PUBLISHING
Open-day posterTemplate · campus details
Course guidePrint · digital · accessible
Campus signageWayfinding · fixed details
ONE INSTITUTION
Shared standardBrand identity stays fixed Image consent checked Accessible by design
PUBLISH WITH CONFIDENCE
Ready to publishRules travel with the work
Policy-first. Not design-first.
Recruitment season does not wait for the brand team.
Open day posters, course leaflets, conference material and campus signage are made in dozens of places at once. Student photography carries consent obligations that outlast the prospectus it appeared in, and accessibility requirements apply to all of it.
Central marketing cannot review every item, and does not need to if the rules travel with the templates and the images. When departments can see what is allowed before they publish, approval is reserved for the work that genuinely needs judgement.
Rules that travel with the work
Governance, built into the work.
From departmental templates and student image consent to accessible publishing and institution-wide evidence, make the rules part of the work.
Student image consent
Permission, scope and expiry travel with the photograph. Consent is checked at download and export, and withdrawal shows what was built on the image.
Accessible templates
Build structure and contrast decisions into templates so teams are not making them under deadline. Templates support accessibility; they do not replace an audit of your digital estate.
Evidence when asked
Export a record of creation, approval and distribution by department, ready to support governance reporting and a procurement business case.
For higher education
Good questions.
Clear answers.
Practical answers for the people responsible for keeping a distributed brand secure.
Will this slow departments down?
It should speed them up. The delay in most institutions is the approval queue, and the queue exists because nobody can be sure what a department has produced. When the rules are built into the template, most material needs no approval at all.
Can departments still have their own look and their own message?
Yes, within the institutional identity. Departments get their own templates, their own imagery and their own messaging. What is fixed is the part that makes it one institution.
How does this handle student image consent?
Consent is recorded against the photograph, with its scope and expiry, and checked at the point of download and export. If consent has lapsed or was never recorded, the image does not reach finished artwork. If a student withdraws consent, you can see what was built on it and prevent further use.
Does it cover accessibility?
Templates carry the structure and contrast decisions that accessible material depends on, so the department is not making those judgements under deadline. It is not a substitute for an accessibility audit of your digital estate.
How does this work with procurement?
It is bought as a compliance and governance platform rather than as design software, which is usually the right route through a procurement process. We can provide the material a business case needs, including how the audit trail supports data protection and governance reporting.
A question worth asking
How many departments published in your name this term?
The Brand Risk Audit walks your institution with you and shows where material is being produced outside central rules, where student image consent cannot be evidenced, and what a complaint or a data protection request would take to answer today.
Book a demo